Category Archives: Prototypes

North American Railway Signaling, Part 1: Basics

Railway signals play a critical role in the movement of trains on a line. Generally signals convey information about the occupancy of the track ahead and whether the train can safely proceed or needs to stop. Unlike with cars, the stopping distance for a train is generally greater than the sight distance of the engineer, so the safe operation of a train is absolutely dependent on the signal system telling the engineer what to expect ahead. For this article we will stick to signals common to North American railroads, and mainly focus on signals that can be found on modern Class I railroads.

Definitions

Before we can get into the basics of signaling there are some terms that need to be defined so that the concepts will be easier to explain:

  • Aspect: What the signal shows (e.g. green, yellow, red, green over red, etc.).
  • Block: A stretch of track into which the entry of a train is controlled by a signal or other form of authority.
  • Diverging route: The route through the curved side of a switch (known in the industry as a turnout).
  • Indication: What the aspect means.
  • Interlocking: A group of one or more switches and associated signals.
  • Maximum Allowable Speed (MAS): The maximum speed at which a train is allowed to operate though an area, as defined in the employee timetable.
  • Name: What the aspect is called (clear, approach, stop, etc.).

Highball!

Nearly everyone in the railroading world knows the term “highball”; it’s synonymous with “full speed ahead”, and basically gives the engineer authority to start moving or continue moving. Conductors and dispatchers often use it when communicating with the engineer of a train. But where does it come from?

Quite literally, a high ball.

One of the earliest forms of railway signal used to control the movement of trains was the ball signal, which consisted of a red ball on a rope and pulley, mounted on a pole. When the ball was raised (high), it meant the next block was clear and the approaching train could proceed at MAS. So let’s continue at MAS into railway signaling!

Signaling Basics

The view from Ogilvie Transportation Center in Chicago, IL, with a sea of signals visible. Complex areas like this may use speed signaling rather than route signaling, or even “go/no go” signals.
Matt Csenge photo.

In North America, there are two general categories of signaling used by Class I Railroads: speed signaling and route signaling. The types basically do exactly what it says on the cover: speed signaling tells the engineer how fast to go, and route signaling tells the enginer what route the train is lined for. Route signaling is the more common type of signaling, with speed signaling being used in dense corridors where there are multiple routes a train could take. In these complex areas using speed signaling the engineer may not know exactly where their train will be going, but they know what speed they need to be going to get there safely. With route signaling, the engineer knows exactly where their train will be going, and has to remember (or look up in the timetable) what is the maximum speed they can be going to get there safely.

Signals are placed at two distinct locations on the railroad: block signals are placed at the beginning of a block (in any direction that a train is allowed to travel within the block) and home signals are placed at interlockings. The block signal preceeding a home signal is known as a distant signal.

The rear of a BNSF Railway coal train passing a basic block signal on Crawford Hill in Nebraska.
Matt Csenge photo.

Basic block signals consist of a single head with three lights: red, yellow, and green. On most North American railroads, each signal head can only have one light lit at a time and thus can display three aspects: stop, approach, and clear, respectively. There is also a fourth color that is used occasionally: lunar white (aka lunar), which displays an aspect known as restricting. Here is a quick explanation of what these four aspects mean:

  • Clear (green): The block is clear, and the next signal does not indicate stop; proceed at MAS.
  • Approach (yellow): The block is clear and the next signal indicates stop; prepare to stop at the next signal.
  • Stop (red): The block is occupied, do not proceed.
  • Restricting (lunar): The block is occupied, proceed at restricted speed. Restricted speed is defined as a speed at which you can stop within half of your sight distance, maximum 15 mph, expecting to encounter a train. (Why half sight distance? There may be another train coming the other way at restricting speed!)
Six-track signal gantry with distant signals on the Long Island Rail Road in Woodside, Queens, NY.
Matt Csenge photo.

Home and distant signals need more than one signal head to display a sufficient amount of information, and thus may have as many as three heads. The aspects displayed by these three heads is about the status of interlockings, so for now we will just stick with the basic four above. The aspects and indications are listed again below with the aspects for two and three head signals:

  • Clear (green / green over red / green over red over red): The block is clear, and the next signal does not indicate stop; proceed at MAS.
  • Approach (yellow / yellow over red / yellow over red over red): The block is clear and the next signal indicates stop; prepare to stop at the next signal.
  • Stop (red / red over red / red over red over red): The block is occupied, do not proceed.
  • Restricting (lunar / lunar over red / lunar over red over red / red over lunar / red over lunar over red / red over red over lunar): The block is occupied, proceed at restricted speed.

Types of Signals

Common types of signals in use on North American railroads include color lights, searchlights, position lights (PLs), color position lights (CPLs), and position color lights (PCLs). Color lights are by far the most common, and the aspects in the basics section above are those of a color light signal.

Color Lights

Color light signal. This style is known as “Darth Vader,” due to the large hood over all three lenses.
Photo from railroadsignals.us

Color light signals are by far the most common type of signal in the United States at present. Many railroads have begun to replace other types of signals with color lights in an effort to standardize the signals across their entire system. Most color light signal heads consist of three lenses, with green at top, yellow at middle, and red at bottom. Sometimes the signal heads are oriented sideways, though this is not common. Another type is the “Tri-Light”, which features the three colors arranged in a triangular shape on a circular background. A proper tri-light would be very difficult to recreate at scale with Lego, given the triangular arrangement on a circular background.

Lego 4541 Road and Rail Service Truck

Many designs of color light signal have been built in Lego, and have even been included in Lego sets, such as 4541. One major gripe that I personally have with these is that they are “go/no go” signals that lack a yellow approach indication. While these types of signals are often used in yards, terminals, or other slow-speed locations, they would practicaly never be used on the mainline (at least not in North America). A train would not be able to stop for a red signal if it was operating at full speed when the engineer saw the signal, which is why the approach indication is so important: it tells the engineer the next signal is red, so be prepared to stop then. This gives them plenty of time to slow the train, before they even see the red signal.

Searchlights

Two-head searchlight signal.
Mark Vogel photo.

Searchlight signals consist of one light with an internal mechanism that moves different colored lenses in front of the light. Working searchlights are also difficult in Lego, as they would depend on a multi-color LED.

Position Lights (PLs)

A trio of Position Light signals on the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) in Queens, NY.
Matt Csenge photo.

Position lights were developed by the Pennsylvania Railroad, and consist circular heads with lines of lights at different angles (the center light is common to all aspects). These position of these lights mimic the position of the blade of a semaphore signal, the predecessor to these signals. Most PLs have a second head with at least one light, so they can shown additional speed aspects.

Here’s an example of a Lego position light signal:

Modular PRR Position Light signal by Matt Csenge.

Position lights were installed throughout the Pennsy’s territory, and can still be found along the Northeast Corridor and the lines of many other railroads, like CSX, Norfolk Southern (NS), and the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR, sic). Variations include dwarf and pedestal PLs, which are used in yards, terminals, and other areas where a full PL is not needed. (Note that “dwarf signal” is the correct industry term for these small signals used in yards, terminals, and other restricted clearance areas.)

An Amtrak train racing past a PCL signal at Secaucus Junction station in New Jersey.
Matt Csenge photo.

Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor between New York City and Washington DC was once the Pennsylvania Railroad mainline, and thus was chock full of PLs. At some point Amtrak added colored lenses to their PLs, making them Position Color Lights (not to be confused with Color Position Lights, which we’ll talk about next). PCLs also resemble “Red Eyes” PLs, which are standard PLs with two red lights for the stop indication, but red eyes PLs have a center lamp for use with the approach and clear indications.

Color Position Lights (CPLs)

B&O Color Position Light signals.
Photo from railroadsignals.us

Color position lights were developed by the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad around the same time as PLs. They feature one main head with up to four indications (the ones listed above), and as many as six marker lights above and below the main head to display speed information. CPLs can be differentiated from PLs because there is no middle light and the aspects are in color: vertical is green (clear), horizontal is red (stop), 45° right is yellow (approach), and 45° left is lunar (restricting).

Here’s an example of a Lego CPL Lego:

Full Color Position Light signal WIP by Matt Csenge

Similar to PLs, CPLs have dwarf varitions as well:

Modular dwarf Color Position Light signal by Matt Csenge.

Additional Complexity

This covers the basics of railway signaling in North America. Getting further into route and speed signaling, home signals, and interlockings will require their own articles, as these concepts get very complex. The indications of signals vary slightly from railroad to railroad, thus adding to the complexity. I was told once that Amtrak engineers on some routes need to be able to interpret as many as 6 different types of signals by memory, as their routes use the tracks of various freight railroads and thus their signal systems too.

Here’s one fun shot I wanted to share, of a cable car signal in San Francisco. I took this shot to tease my CEE 410 Railway Signaling professor by asking what the indication is for “red X over green over green arrow over white person?” He just laughed and suggested we order another beer!

Cable car signal in San Francisco.
Photo by Matt Csenge

Stickers or Brick Built: A short Case Study with the MÁv M40 Diesel

Being a Model Railroader and AFOL in one, it’s always difficult to make sure a model looks like it’s prototype. As AFOL, you are always trying to use exactly that one piece of Lego that corresponds with a certain greeble, angle or form of the prototype, even though it might not fit 100%. As a Model Railroader, you always want to make sure something fits 100%, meaning that not always you can use a piece of Lego, but for example using stickers, 3d printed rods, or custom track. This difficult trade-off is what makes our little niche hobby (at least for me!) so great. On the other hand, it does mean a lot of extra hassle. Even more, because most of the time both solutions tend to be possible.

Therefore, we thought it might be interesting to look at two amazing renditions of the same prototype, which are build in exactly those two styles: The Model Railroader and the AFOL. The prototype that we chose is the MÁV M40, a Hungarian Diesel Locomotive build in the sixties with a lot of strange lines and greebles. It looks like this:

The red version
The green version

So, how does this look like when two Hungarian Lego builders, lantlant and Rob, both try to re-build this beast in Lego, the one with emphasis on Model Railroad Realism, and the other with emphasis on Lego Railroad Realism?

First of, let us look at the Lego Railroad Realism:

MÁV M40 "púpos"
side 1
MÁV M40 "púpos"
side 2

As you can see, Rob has tried to solve all difficult corners and angles that the M40 has with brick built solutions. He has even done some very effective weathering by using dark red, dark grey and even black pieces to illustrate the grease and dirt that these Diesels most probably will be covered in during most of their active duty. However, no stickers means no stickers, so there are no identification numbers, no logos and nothing that explains which exact locomotive this is. For a true Model Railroader, this is of course not done. For an AFOL, this is – with good reason! – perfectly fine, because it’s not about that identification of the one loco, but the rendition in Lego of a whole class of locomotives.

Now, let’s look at the Model Railroad Realism:

MÁV M40 114
side 1
MÁV M40 114
side 2

As you can see, lantlant actually tried to solve quite a lot of parts by using brick-build solutions, but for example the cab and smokestack, plus the diamond pattern warning ‘stripes’ on the front of the loco are all done with high-quality stickers. It gives this loco a bit less of a Lego, and a bit more of a Model Train experience. Also, by some subtle stickering, lantlant has been able to give the shrouding of the wheelsets a bit of extra depth. On the other hand, it does, mostly with the windscreen, feel a bit ‘lazy’ that he didn’t go the Lego way. It does give you a stunning rendition of that windscreen though!

So, what do you, our readers, think about this? What do you think is more important when building, Model Railroaders Realism or Lego Railroaders Realism?

NS 2400: Designing and building three locomotives in just under three weeks time

The date is February 2019. I was become a bit bored with building landscapes and infrastructure for my Bahnbetriebswerk [ https://brickmodelrailroader.com/index.php/2019/06/06/the-design-of-bhw-neukirche-by-enrico-lussi/ ]. I wanted to build something different, a locomotive that would be a real “working horse”.  It took me three weeks from the design to the building of not just one but a total of three locomotives. In this article I will take you readers into the design process and how I was able to design and build in such a short time.

I was spending every “Lego building” time that I had into my Bahnbetriebswerk. Which is something that isn’t that unusual when you build such a huge layout. The problem was that I was getting bored with the Bahnbetriebswerk. To get some renewed energy back into the hobby I decided that I would spend all my free time for three weeks in building a locomotive. By doing this I would get new inspiration and energy for the Bahnbetriebswerk.

But how do you decide which engine is best to build?

I decided to separate the three weeks into three phases (each week one phase). The first would be the research, the second the design, and the third the actual building. But first, a bit of history.

The “workshop” table with a couple of my MOC’s during trains day at Brick King. From left to right: ICM 4001 “Koploper” NS2454, NS 2459, NS 2412. That workshop became the inspiration for this article.

History

The NS 2400 [WIKI LINKJE] was a diesel electric series locomotive built for the Dutch Railways in the 1950’s. They were used from 1954 until 1991. They were designed and build by Alsthom in France. The first 16 engines where painted light blue, the rest of the series was brown and from 1971 they got the famous Dutch yellow and gray color scheme. In 1991 all of them were either  sold or scraped. Several of them ended up in Belgium, Saudi Arabia, France and Italy. After their service abroad, several came back home again. In total there a 6 still in the Netherlands, they are owned and used by Dutch Railway museums . The numbers of those 6 are as follows: 2412, 2424, 2454, 2459, 2498, 2530.

The light blue NS 2412, the blue colors is really discolored by the son in this picture, yes the son doesn’t only discolor Lego, but trains to. Beside the NS 2412 is the NS 2019 a locomotive which is imported from the USA to the Netherlands.

The Research Process

The “normal” research process that I do for a train takes around a month. The reason that this time I was able to do the research in just one week was the fact that I already had accumulated information for a long time. I already had a lot of detail pictures on my hard drive, and a few books with Technic information about the locomotives. And to top it all Raised was able to provide me with a scaled drawing that I was able to get to the scale I built (1:45 for the win!!!). Also, since several of these loco’s are currently used in a lot of Railway museums in the Netherlands the ability of seeing these locomotives in acting is just an hour drive from my home for me.

Since I already had a lot of the information I needed at hand, I was able to start the project quick and with ease. For the readers that are wondering, “why do you need all that research for a Lego train?”, the answer is quite easy, I try to build a “copy” of the real-life version in Lego. Because you’re building a copy you need to transfer each detail into Lego, if you miss a detail, it won’t become an exact copy. And beside that people like Raised and my other fellow LUG members won’t stop criticizing my locomotives if they miss a detail 😉

This picture really shows how the squire looking design has some strange and unique curves. So, 1 week down, 2 to go.

The Design Process

My normal design progress contains a lot of trial and error in LDD (Lego digital designer). For a change however I wanted to use a different design process, something Raised and UrbanErwin swore by. By getting designs of the original locomotive in scale 1:45 I was able to work out the sizes and scale of the locomotives. Besides that, it provides a perfect “blueprint”. The original design plan was in scale 1:400, Raised was kind enough to scale them to 1:45 by using Photoshop and then I was able to print them out on A3 paper.

I decided to build a prototype by using the scaled designs of the locomotive and all the bricks I had in storage, colors I had in storage were mostly black, dark bluish grey (DBG) and Light Bluish Grey (LBG). Because I wasn’t restricted to colors I could experiment as much as I wanted until I finally had a design I was satisfied with. Rainbow designs are the best. The best thing about this is that you can get a quick 3D model which shows how the engine is going to look. I really recommend doing this! You get a quick good look at how your model is going to look and it definitely helps with the Bricklink part later.

The difficult thing about the design of the NS 2400 is that it looks really squire, but it has a lot of strange and unique curves and beside that in scale both “noses” are 5 width and believe me that is not a fun with to build (more about that later).

But there was one problem. It took me around 4 days the design the locomotive. However I wasn’t satisfied with the nose; it looks like a simple design, but it truly isn’t. The nose has 4 lights in it that all have a size that’s difficult to build in Lego if you try to build exactly to scale. Second was the height; the nose is now 6 bricks high but in 1:45 scale it should be around 5 bricks, but the amazing Martijn decided to help me out by quickly designing a prototype nose in LDD. He couldn’t change the height of the nose, but he was able to help with the difficult shape.

The real life version and the Lego model, there a couple of details that don’t match. And I promise I will change that…. one day.

I still had 8 days left for the building progress, building itself wasn’t the problem, but the shipping time however, was.

Building progress.

I decided to build 3 different locomotives. They each are based on a locomotive that is preserved in a museum in the Netherlands and by building 3 I was able to build one in each color scheme that the locomotives had, being light blue, brown and dark gray-yellow.

I won’t take you through the entire Brick Link progress, but I got to mention that I was fortunate enough that I was able to purchase all the parts from Brick Link stores which shipped quickly. After 3 days of waiting patiently the first orders started to arrive, but there was a problem, something little called college… I had a very important week of exams, so I couldn’t build for most of the 8 days that I had left, losing most of the days. I only was able to start Friday 16:00, (meaning I had until Monday evening to finish 3 locomotives), after I finished my exam and rushed to the metro to get to the closest train station. After watching the trains arriving and departing, I got on my train that would take me home. 18:00. Let’s get this party started.

In just 3 hours I was able to get 80% done of the brown version(2459) but I was still missing a Bricklink order. Luckily the last final and very important order arrived Saturday morning. And then the marathon really began. The reason I started with the brown version is simple: The parts of the brown version arrived first.

For power there was a big problem. There wasn’t a lot of room inside the engine to place an IR receiver and a battery box. Placing the battery box was already tricky, however, I was able to hide the battery box by using a clever trick and thus placing most of the battery box inside the cabin. So, I had 2 options, Powered Up or SBrick (there are more options out there, but I don’t use/have the laying around). A difficult decision to make, but why make the decision to go for only one? Since I was making 3 locomotives, way not use both! So, the brown one (2459) has 2 pf train motors a reachable battery box and a SBrick. The blue (2412) and yellow-gray (2454) have 2 powered up motors and battery box.

This picture shows how much “space” there really is in my NS 2400 design. And yes that’s a rubber band holding the pf wires together.

And then, finally, Monday evening! Did I make it? Yes, I did. But was I completely satisfied with the result? Not totally: The undersides use simple parts, and really miss a lot of details. I still haven’t got around to finish it. But I promise, one day I will get to it and I will let you guys know!

So, that’s it for now. Three weeks and three new locomotives later I was finished. But it was a great journey and I hope that I was able to take you to the journey and hopefully inspire you to build! Because that’s the goal of this article, to tell you that you don’t need that months and months or even years and years before you finish your MOC; just three weeks is enough to have a great time! 

Three weeks, three locomotives, do I need to say more?

Siemens Medway 4717 in 1:20

Even though the most beloved scale of BMR is somewhere in the lines of 1:45 (Europe) or 1:48 (US), that doesn’t mean we don’t try go give some love to other scales as well. Today, over at the Eurobricks Train Tech Forums, Sérgio Batista showed us what you can do if you go a little bit bigger, by presenting his 1:20 Siemens CP4700 in Medway Livery. And with “a little bit” I mean more than doubling the size to 16-wide compared to 8-wide, and more than 2.5 times the width when compared to the 6-wide trains by TLC! And yes, you can definately see that.

48029160491_67037ac424_b.jpg
Medway 4714 “Neuza” by Sérgio Batista

When it comes to this size, it’s mostly the numbers that say it all, so I leave that to Sérgio himself:

“1:20 scale replica (16wide, 128 studs long) more than 5000 parts.”

By the way, this isn’t the first time that Sérgio made this loco. In fact, the Medway version of the CP4700 is ‘nothing more’ than a reskin of his previous incarnation, when Medway was still owned by CP, the National Railways of Portugal, and named CP Carga. In my opinion this is an even better loco, and it’s a shame that Medway decided on this absolutely boring livery, but hey, it did give Sérgio a chance go build this beauty, so I guess that’s something.

47979056736_896d2d0170_c.jpg
CP Carga 4700 by Sérgio Batista

So, the obvious question now is: Will he ever build this black beauty IRL? Well, chances are pretty big, since the CP Carga version was already!

Nenhuma descrição de foto disponível.

Two fun facts: The wheels of this beast are Motorcycle rims! And for extra craziness: Yes, in the Iberian peninsula they use Iberian Broad Gauge of 1668mm compared to Standard Gauge of 1435mm, which makes this loco even more special than it already was.

Buffalo Creek & Gauley 2-8-0 #13 by Glenn Holland

I’ll be honest. Building models for BMR, such as the NMRA and Brickworld exclusives, the bulkhead flatcar, and now six versions of an extended vision caboose, has been fantastic. I wouldn’t trade this experience for anything. But it’s now been over two and a half years since I added a locomotive, or any piece of rolling stock for that matter, to my personal fleet, coming from my to-do list rather than BMR’s.

This was a topic of conversation between Cale and I at the end of 2018. We were hanging out together over the final weekend of the year getting ready to announce the T-1 and prepare for other things coming up. At that point, it had been a little over two years since I built a locomotive that was good enough to keep. (I did build a 2-10-4 in that time, but I don’t count it because it never worked properly and has been mostly dismantled.) That had to change.

BC&G #13, modeled by Glenn Holland. Fireman’s side front, 3/4 view. Cale Leiphart photo.

Several locomotives were brought up as contenders for my new project. My primary goal was to select a locomotive which could be built from start to finish with a minimum of custom work and electronics. In essence, I wanted a strong jumping off point instead of having to perfect several new techniques like a drive-train. Cale and I had recently completed the S160 2-8-0 for Brickmania, so I was inspired to build a similarly sized locomotive: a 2-8-0 or 2-8-2 would be the perfect size, it could use the same “golden” drive-train as the S160, and I had no suitable freight locomotives. I began to look through my build list and found a locomotive that met all the criteria.

The Buffalo Creek & Gauley Railroad

Growing up I was gifted a boxed set of VHS tapes called “American Steam: A Vanishing Era.” These old tapes comprised of old black and white and color film of steam railroading right up to the end of mainline steam power and beyond. My favorite was “Steam Shortlines of the South” which was a collection of footage from numerous small steam-powered railroads in the Southern United States. The Buffalo Creek & Gauley was one of these railroads, although featured for only a few minutes. The tape showed a hefty 2-8-0 switching strings of coal cars at the line’s interchange with the Baltimore & Ohio. That was my first contact with this incredible shortline.

The BC&G shops at Dundon, WV. The mainline is to the right and continues on to the interchange. The rest of the line continues the opposite direction behind the photographer. Doug WIngfield photo – November 1961, from Brook’s website

The Buffalo Creek & Gauley was a coal hauling railroad with connections to the B&O in Dundon, Clay County, West Virginia. If there was ever a perfect West Virginia coal-hauling shortline, the BC&G was it. The line ran from Dundon all the way to the mine in Widen, West Virginia with several unincorporated towns along the way.

BC&G #14 passing the dairy at Cressmont. Photo by Jack Wheelihan – September 1963, from Brook’s website.
Continue reading Buffalo Creek & Gauley 2-8-0 #13 by Glenn Holland

General Updates and a Surprise Announcement: A New Locomotive

It’s been a while since we’ve posted any update on our work behind the scenes. Allow us to offer some insight today, as well as a surprise announcement at the end.

Premium Instructions Kits

The cover for our 164 page book.

We’ve been hard at work in getting our next Premium Instruction Kit ready to go. I’ve modeled the International Car Company Extended Vision Caboose in fine detail, and Cale has been working non-stop to bring the book to completion. We would have had this model available by now, but we have drastically expanded our vision and approach to the kit, and thus have taken more time to ensure we are checking all of our boxes. We’ll have more details in the announcement article at the time of release, but I can definitely say that this will be the most comprehensive kit we have ever done. We are now in the process of editing the 164-page book and building test models.

All six models of our Extended Vision Caboose.
Reading decal set.
Continue reading General Updates and a Surprise Announcement: A New Locomotive

The First Locomotive From Brick Model Railroader

It’s finally time.

After a year and a half of trial, failure, and redesigning, and exactly one year after we originally planned to, Cale and I are pleased to announce the first ever Brick Model Railroader steam locomotive kit.

The locomotive we have chosen to model is a Reading 4-8-4 T-1.

BMR Prototype Model, Engineer Side 3/4 Veiw
BMR Prototype Model, Side Veiws
BMR Prototype Model,Fireman’s Side Rear 3/4 Veiw
BMR Prototype Model,Nose Profile

This is a locomotive we are very excited about. The Reading Railroad was located in the eastern part of the state of Pennsylvania, and the BMR Model Team (Cale and Glenn) are Pennsylvania residents, making the Reading a home road for us. The Reading T-1 felt like a natural choice for a prototype for both Cale and myself. It has been on both of our “to do” lists for a while, but other projects have taken priority since. The T-1 will fit well with all of our current transition-era Premium Instructions models, as all of them were used on the Reading and could very well have been seen behind a T-1 at any point during their service life.

img029

I’m sure many of our readers are wondering why it’s taken so long to get to this point. Allow me to answer a few questions you may be having.

Continue reading The First Locomotive From Brick Model Railroader

Conway Scenic Railroad by Dawson Santoro

If you’re in the Jackson, New Hampshire area this summer, swing by the Jackson Public Library and check out this awesome LEGO rendition of the Conway Scenic Railroad by Dawson Santoro.

The Conway Scenic is a a tourist line in the Mount Washington Valley of New Hampshire, offering passenger excursions through the White Mountains.  Their colorful consists include a number of vintage locomotives and cars, including the 0-6-0 Canadian National 7470 that Dawson chose to model for his display.

I asked Dawson a few questions about his very professional build.

BMR:  What was the original inspiration behind choosing the Conway Scenic as a prototype to model?

DS:  I’ve been following PENNLUG for a few years now, the models they build are truly amazing and they inspired me to build a train with that level of detail. And since I’ve been coming to Jackson, New Hampshire every summer for the past fifteen years, I chose to build the Conway Scenic Railroad which is a major tourist attraction in the area. by invitation, for the past two summers, I’ve had some custom LEGO builds on display and for this year I chose the Conway Scenic because everyone here in The Mount Washington Valley, knows about and has seen or been on the real thing so it’s relatable to everyone.

BMR:  What is your design process? Do you work with virtual models on a computer first, or do you work more hands on with physical bricks as you build?

DS:  My design process was to first look at a lot of close up pictures that I took of the real train last summer and I tried to figure out what LEGO parts I could use for each feature of the train. I also looked at a lot of LEGO models from other builders to get ideas. I designed one of the coaches on LEGO Digital Designer to get an idea of how each one would look and have a rough list of parts I would need. I modified each coach as I built them and I would often take apart a lot of the detail and rebuilt it differently to get it as accurate as I could. For the steam locomotive, I designed the boiler, cab, gearbox and coal tender on LEGO Digital Designer. Since it was my first locomotive I’ve built there was a lot of trial and error with building with physical bricks. I much prefer actually building my models and being able to see how it’s going to turn out and what works and what doesn’t.

BMR:  How long was the design and build process?

DS:  I started building this model in November 2017 and finished it at the beginning of May this year which is about six months from designing it to applying on the decals at the end. Before I started designing it I already knew how I was going to power it so I ordered the power functions I needed back in September. I first started building the locomotive which took me about a month and a half to complete the rough shape and functions of the gearing. Throughout the rest of the building of the coaches and the track, I didn’t stop working on the locomotive, adding small detail or changing details I didn’t like or thought I could improve on.

Visit Dawson’s Flickr page to see more, including Conway Scenic’s beautiful Dorthea Mae dome Car.

Vintage Caboose Tours

With the release of the Brick Model Railroader Northeastern Style Caboose, I thought I’d give a short photo tour of a couple of vintage vans that plied their trade in the the northeastern states of Vermont and New York along the old Rutland Railroad.

First up is Rutland Caboose #28. Currently on display at Steamtown National Historic Site in Scranton, Pennsylvania, #28 is a fully restored piece, varnished in Cherry Red, that I was able to visit while traveling to BrickFair in Virginia back in 2009. According to the National Park System’s documentation, caboose #28 was built in 1920 by the Rutland car shops. Built to the New York Central design, the caboose features a cupola that is offset to one end of the van, with a comfortable interior for the crew. The caboose was assigned to the lines between Rutland, Vermont and Ogdensburg, New York. It ended it’s working life as a bunkhouse in Bellows Falls, Vermont before being donated in 1961 to F. Nelson Blount for display at the original Steamtown site in Vermont. The restoration of #28 took place in 1995. The caboose was on display inside of one of Steamtown’s buildings, which made getting exterior shots difficult, but did provide for a look at the roof line.

Roof of Rutland #28

 

Lettering of Caboose #28

 

#28 Showing a Rebuild Date of July, 1933

 

Restored Interior of Rutland #28

 

The second caboose is Rutland #45, currently on display outside of the Center Rutland Depot just outside of Rutland, Vermont. The Depot is home of the Rutland Railway Association, who have both a museum and model railroad club on site. This caboose actually lives just a few miles from where I live, so I’ve photographed it a few times over the years, including a couple of days ago to show its current state. Though the caboose is off-limits to the public, in the summer of 2016, a couple of the Association’s members allowed me a look inside the unrestored caboose. While it’s a bit run down (it *is* almost 100 years old), it was quite a treat to see the original floor, paint, and layout. Most interesting to me were the beautiful cast-iron seats up in the cupola which allowed would have allowed for a great view for the train crew.

#45 was built in June of 1924. Originally numbered #95, it was renumbered a few months later along with the rest of the 90 series. Like Steamtown’s #28, it ran on the Ogdensburg sub-division of the Rutland lines. With the end of the Rutland Railroad in the mid 1960s, Rutland #45 become Vermont Railway’s #45 when the state of Vermont bought the former Rutland’s assets. VTR #45 was retired from use in the mid 1970s, and moved to Center Rutland by the the early 1990s. Members of the Railway Association are currently restoring both the caboose and the Rutland Depot that is their home.

Rutland Caboose #45 in March of 2010

 

Front end of #45 in 2010

 

Cupola End of #45 in 2010

 

Unrestored Interior of Caboose #45, August of 2016

 

Cast Iron Cupola Seats, Rutland Caboose #45

 

Rutland Caboose #45, April 2018, Restoration in Progress